Chinese President Xi Jinping used a high-profile international platform to champion the expansion of BRICS, urging member nations to strengthen cooperation and push back against what he described as outdated power politics dominated by Western countries. In remarks that carried unmistakable diplomatic weight, Xi rejected the notion that economic or military strength should dictate global decision-making, framing his vision around greater inclusion for developing economies.
The comments, delivered at an event bringing together leaders from across the Global South, signaled Beijing's strategic interest in consolidating its influence through the BRICS grouping, which currently includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, along with several newer members who joined in recent years. Analysts noted that the push for a 'Greater BRICS' reflects China's long-term objective to reshape international institutions and reduce reliance on Western-led financial and diplomatic frameworks.
Xi emphasized the need for multilateralism rooted in equality rather than hierarchy, arguing that the current global order disproportionately favors established powers at the expense of emerging economies. He called for reforms to institutions such as the United Nations Security Council, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank, saying they must better reflect the realities of a multipolar world.
The Chinese leader also highlighted opportunities for deeper collaboration within BRICS on trade, technology, and sustainable development, suggesting that member states could build alternative payment systems and reduce dependence on the US dollar. His remarks came amid growing tensions between China and Western nations over trade policies, technology restrictions, and geopolitical disputes.
While India, a founding BRICS member, has maintained a carefully balanced foreign policy position, observers noted that Xi's address was partly aimed at reinforcing solidarity among non-Western powers. The president did not mention specific countries by name but framed the debate as one between cooperative multilateralism and unilateral coercion.
International reaction was mixed, with some developing nations welcoming the emphasis on inclusion while others cautioned against forming new blocs that could deepen global divisions. Western diplomats expressed concern that an expanded BRICS could accelerate the fragmentation of the existing international order.
