The Karnataka government's much-touted free shoe distribution programme for school-going children is facing severe criticism over the quality of footwear being provided, with parents and teachers reporting that the shoes are falling apart within just a few days of use.
The controversy centres on the state's scheme, launched to ensure that children from economically weaker sections do not go without proper footwear — a basic requirement for attending school and maintaining hygiene. However, beneficiaries have described a troubling pattern where the soles of the shoes begin separating or breaking within days, rendering them unusable before the initial promise of lasting utility can be fulfilled.
Parents across multiple districts have expressed frustration, noting that the poor quality undermines the very purpose of the scheme. Many reported spending additional money on replacements or repairs, defeating the objective of the free distribution initiative. Teachers in government schools have also raised concerns, stating that several students arrived at school unable to wear the issued shoes due to rapid deterioration.
The issue escalated when complaints were forwarded to the office of the Upa Lokayukta, Justice K.N. Phaneendra, who took suo motu cognizance of the matter. By accepting the complaints as a public interest grievance without needing a formal petition, the Lokayukta has signalled the seriousness with which the administration is viewing the alleged mismanagement.
An inquiry is expected to examine the procurement process behind the scheme — including the tendering procedure, quality standards set for vendors, and whether adequate checks were in place before distribution. Critics are calling for a transparent review of how contracts were awarded and whether cost-cutting measures compromised the durability of the footwear.
The state government has yet to issue an official response to the allegations, but sources suggest that officials are reviewing the procurement records. Education department insiders have indicated that the quality complaint is not isolated and may require a broader reassessment of the supply chain for student supplies under the scheme.
Advocates for children's rights have urged the government to prioritise durable, functional footwear over quantity, arguing that repeatedly distributing substandard shoes does more harm than good — not only financially for poor families but also in terms of student dignity and attendance.
