In a sharply worded public response, veteran Congress leader and former Finance Minister P Chidambaram declared himself willing to wear the label 'Dimagi Naxal' (intellectual Naxal) with pride, directly countering a series of personal attacks made by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The remarks followed Modi's recent speech in which he referred to Chidambaram as a 'naraaz fufa' (angry uncle) and reinforced the government's pledge to eradicate all forms of Naxal ideology across the country. Chidambaram, addressing reporters shortly after, stated that he found the 'Dimagi Naxal' tag an honourable designation for anyone who critically examines government policies, and brushed aside the 'angry uncle' comment as mere political theatre designed to distract from substantive governance issues. The former Union minister also pointed out that Modi's creative use of demeaning vocabulary seemed to reflect a frustration with facing well‑informed opposition rather than engaging with policy differences. Political observers noted that the exchange highlights an ongoing trend in which the Prime Minister’s office has increasingly employed personalised, colloquial insults to marginalise senior opposition figures. Chidambaram, who has been at the centre of several high‑profile legal cases involving money‑laundering and corruption allegations stemming from the 2G spectrum deal, has consistently denied any wrongdoing and framed the prosecutions as politically motivated. The Congress leader’s decision to reclaim the 'intellectual Naxal' epithet mirrors a broader rhetorical strategy adopted by some opposition circles to deflect character assassination by turning pejorative labels into badges of defiance. Analysts suggest that such verbal spats, while dramatised in media cycles, ultimately underscore the deepening political polarisation and the declining decorum in India’s highest‑level political discourse. Both sides are expected to continue using pointed rhetoric as electoral considerations loom in several states.